Post by account_disabled on Dec 6, 2023 5:38:06 GMT -5
Don't tell me that you talk to your friends in the same way as you would in a job interview or a university exam, etc. We are human beings, we are neither politicians nor rich nor noble. We tend to interrupt our interlocutor : the dialogue breaks, divides, opens parentheses and is diverted elsewhere, towards other thoughts and concepts, before retracing its steps. We make fun and make jokes : it's part of us - of me, then, it's almost the prevailing part - to joke with friends, to use sarcasm, to have offhand humour. We hesitate aloud : when we speak, we are facing each other. If they ask us a question, we don't sit around for 3 minutes staring into space - unless it's one of my school questions: there were a lot of minutes on those occasions - but we try to think about the answer verbally to give. We tend to repeat : if they ask us a question, it is often normal for us to repeat it, as if the answer scared us.
Here's what Peter wrote on May 17, 2002 in his post Play With Your Words , talking about exactly how he coined that term: For What It's Worth I've decided to pronounce the word “weblog” as wee'- blog. Or “blog” for short. I enjoyed reading some articles on his blog, but not the last ones, but the first ones, those from 1998. Centuries ago, given the speed with which Phone Number Data technology progresses and the speed with which everything we use ages. The first narrators of the network I quote the incipit of Peter's first post: May 7, 1998 I can't keep my eyes off the new Apple Dodge Neon. I want the one in candied red. Don't you notice anything strange? Different from today? I do, the title of the post: May 7, 1998 . Not an actual title, but a date, no SEO, I guess it didn't even exist at that time. A date. Because at that time the blog was just that, a diary, we all know it.
I'm sorry, but I think that today with our blogs we aren't really telling anything. What if we continued to narrate? After reading some of those posts it is even clearer to me what those pioneers of blogging did: they narrated themselves and their lives, perhaps theming their articles based on their hobbies and activities. But they told stories. What if we went back to those times? What if we went back to telling how it was done in the early days of blogging? How much purer would our writing be and how much purer would our posts be? Think about it. And let me know what you think.For me, even an author I read, and not just a blogger, must like me.
Here's what Peter wrote on May 17, 2002 in his post Play With Your Words , talking about exactly how he coined that term: For What It's Worth I've decided to pronounce the word “weblog” as wee'- blog. Or “blog” for short. I enjoyed reading some articles on his blog, but not the last ones, but the first ones, those from 1998. Centuries ago, given the speed with which Phone Number Data technology progresses and the speed with which everything we use ages. The first narrators of the network I quote the incipit of Peter's first post: May 7, 1998 I can't keep my eyes off the new Apple Dodge Neon. I want the one in candied red. Don't you notice anything strange? Different from today? I do, the title of the post: May 7, 1998 . Not an actual title, but a date, no SEO, I guess it didn't even exist at that time. A date. Because at that time the blog was just that, a diary, we all know it.
I'm sorry, but I think that today with our blogs we aren't really telling anything. What if we continued to narrate? After reading some of those posts it is even clearer to me what those pioneers of blogging did: they narrated themselves and their lives, perhaps theming their articles based on their hobbies and activities. But they told stories. What if we went back to those times? What if we went back to telling how it was done in the early days of blogging? How much purer would our writing be and how much purer would our posts be? Think about it. And let me know what you think.For me, even an author I read, and not just a blogger, must like me.